Hi All,
So I setup an IPsec tunnel with one of our clients and we had conflicting IP's. Apparently NAT rules do not apply to IPsec tunnels because that is set up as a route. At least that's what I was told from Support.
How hard would it be to setup for example, a Cisco ASA behind Untangle. Give it a public IP and just have everything passed through to it. I would imagine we would have some serious setup in order for this to work. I'm still not convinced it would work though.
Thanks!
So I setup an IPsec tunnel with one of our clients and we had conflicting IP's. Apparently NAT rules do not apply to IPsec tunnels because that is set up as a route. At least that's what I was told from Support.
How hard would it be to setup for example, a Cisco ASA behind Untangle. Give it a public IP and just have everything passed through to it. I would imagine we would have some serious setup in order for this to work. I'm still not convinced it would work though.
Thanks!